Quote:
This week's poll asks:
Do you support the introduction of a capital gains tax?
UPDATE POLL RESULT: Yes - 12%, No - 88%
Quote:
*New Zealand property market as always been favoured amoungst home owners and property investors, due to the lack of a capital gains tax as well as a stamp duty. Keep it status quo. Eric
*WILL THEY ALSO SUPPORT A CAPITAL LOSS REFUND TOO. Alan
*Absolutely!!! Then the people at the bottom of the heap can get some long awaited tax breaks e.g. non-taxable private health insurance premiums, first 10,000 tax free etc, etc. Why should the ratbags at the top of the heap with their family trusts & all the other tax scams that they get up to have ALL the breaks???? Dave
*Just Tax the "Rich" to provide more welfare and "maori settlement" money - enough is enough - Labour the bell tolls for thee!! Mark
*The Government should cut their expenses to be less than the total tax take for that year. Captial gains tax is just another Labour Parties ploy to grab more tax to pay to beneficiaries. NO WAY JOSE. Rex
*Too complex and increased costs would be passed on to those who least can afford it. George
*Overseas investment in NZ is paramount to the countrys economy an income tax would certainly hurt this type of investment. Rex
*I have no capital so it will not effect me, but I know what it will do for the country!!! No No No! Ron
*Its preferable to partial privatisation of the power coys. Stephen
*Increased productivity leads to higher wages and lower taxes. Allister
*Yes, but only if comprehensive with no exemptions, and accompanied by cuts in personal and company tax. Brian
*Your article is spot on! Please try to get it published in the NZ Herald so more people can read the truth of the matter! Kerry
*Too complex. Removing GST from Fresh fruit etc is stupid. Jim
*Labour's proposed capital gains tax is a poorly put together proposal, is not smart and will not get my vote. Sharon
*Removing gift duty shows the point that compliance is higher than the tax take to the community. Capital gains tax would be the same. Kevin
*No, but. I certainly don't support Labour's proposed CGT, but as your commentary indicates, a comprehensive CGT on "earnings" of a capital naqture (i.e. actual earnings adjusted for inflation) would be acceptable provided compensatory reductions in other taxes were made at the same time. Ross
*Drongoism of the highest possible sort, takes accumulated capital and transfers it into the slush fund of the govt. It strays into criminality when a political party will use it to buy votes! David
*With all the exemptions, interpretations,and complications, why bloody bother. This current Labour lot are a disgrace and do not even deserve the title "opposition". Murray
*Phil Goff will lose the next election as Bill English did in 2002 for National & probably the next two as well, except it won't be Goff in charge after 2011; deservedly so, we are sick of socialist Labour taxes. Monica
*Long overdue, even if the horrible nats stay in for another devastating term, Capital gains Tax will eventually have to be instated, why shouldnt they pay tax like everyone else??? Rick
*Revenue is required. CGT is the least painful way to realise this. Michael
*The only way out of the hole we are in is to encourage business, hard work and by that increase production. Ross
*An unfair tax. Raeewyn
*No in the form proposed by Fill Goof. Far too many exemptions and well summed up in Franks article in that it doesn't attempt to change economic behaviour. It only attempts to garner more tax dollars out of a percentage of the population. Roger
*If the owner has used the expenditure on a asset as a tax deduction then by all means. We have an investment property so we are self supporting when we retire. Goff wants to tax that as well, we have not asked for a penny back from our tax on that building, but we get taxed on it's return, so he wants two kicks at the cat. Typical left wing bullshit, trying to turn the have nots against the haves. Sam
*I will support amyone who does NOT introduce a new tax - but spends what we already give more efficiently!! Michael
*No tax increase of any kind whatsoever. Taxes should be cut MUCH further, as should the number of and the salaries for ALL government employees. No further govt. borrowing would be required to fund them. Brendan
*Too costly to implicate and run. Lee
*An attempt to remove any incentive. Keith
*Not well thought out and very difficult to manage with expected returns doubtfull to say the least. Phil
*This country does not have the population to support a CGT and it will push prices of property up more as people will be reluctant to sell. John