Quote:
This week's poll asks:
Do you believe the affirmation of the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples will increase racial division in New Zealand?
Quote:
*Everyone of non Maori decent will become tenants in NZ, paying rent to Maori landlords without ever having a right to own their own land. Who will stay in a country like that.... Terry
*It is a sell out. All New Zealanders should be simply New Zealanders by all law, and free to practise their cultures in their own communities if their cultures do not harm others. Colleen
*John Key's government needs to pull back before it's too late. Rob
*Indigenous Rights. Foreshore & seabed. Canterbury water. November 2011?? Ian
*Maori are not indigenous. They are colonialists just as British. Tim
*Most certainly it will. John Key has done more (in his short time in office) to create a separatist/divisive New Zealand than any other party I can recall. Not to mention the secrecy of this agreement. John Key pays lip service to democracy - he takes the attitude that he knows best and to hell with the people who pay his wages and who put him in to power. I voted for John Key with great optimism, but I am optimistic no longer!!! Margaret
*The more you give Maori the more they want. IWI describes them perfectly-I WANT IT. Patrick
*It possibly will, but like a lot of the UN based 'feel good about yourself' rules they have little pragmatic effect. Guy
*Of course it will fuel Maori claims and increase pakeha antagonism to the perceived Maore gravy train. Ken
*Maori are not and never have been, the indigenous people of New Zealand. To say that a race which arrived in NZ in 1350 is indigenous is wrong. They are immigrants just like every other New Zealander. Maori should obtain no benefit from this ridiculous declaration. Doug
*Maori belief that they are indigenous is a myth. The Oxford dictionary defines indigenous as "native belonging naturally". This hardly defines Maori, they arrived here on a sailing boat the same as my relatives in the form they are now. There was no evolutionary period. What sent them to venture beyond the shores of Hawai i ? My guess is it was starvation
They found on arrival another peace loving race had preceded them so they promptly drove them to a location on the Chathams but not before they had decimated large humbers. If you are looking for indigenous people the closest are the Australian Aboriginies who it is estimated they had been there 10,000 years and evolved there. Maori who are not too sure when they arrived as a stone age race and illiterate it is calculated about 300 years before Europeans. Another factor is very few could call themselves Maori now being diluted by breeding. I estimate only about 2-3 per cent would be half caste or more and possibly there are no 100 per cent Maori left here . With this overwhelming evidence how can they possibly call themselved indigenous. John Key why did you sign this document in such a sneaky way? I said within an hour of your election success you were naive and now you have confirmed it. Colin
*NoNoNo Too Nono. But if aunty helen of the red party had her way there would be as the seabed and foreshore is a direct breach of the treaty of waitangi and would have brought parliament into dictatorship control and reds would be pocketing all the perks and douch. Rawiri
*Rights of indigenous Peoples will be used as a device to milk more money from the NZ taxpayer. Before the election National had me convinced that they would put an end to Treaty Settlements so we could all settle down as one people. Instead some of their actions have favoured Maori and created racial division which is further aggravated by this contentious affirmation. Peter
*I wonder if we will now see a secret deal with ACT over the ETS now that Aus has seen the light, I think not. Key is too gutless to stand up to Maori and he is too gutless to over rule Nick - head in the sand - Smith, while I destested Clark I have to say she had bigger balls than Key. John
*The Maori will exploit this UN declaration to the limit in the courts,where they already have a bias in their favour. Laurie
*What a disgraceful display of political maneuvering by Key and the National Party. I find their actions appalling. Chris
*Overwhelmingly YES. It could well be a disaster for the complete community in NZ. Phil
*I see this signing as another another agreement that is going to be extorted and abused in the future. John
*We have always being proud of our unique & close relationship with each other, this is being (not so) now subtley rent apart by the selfish and the self serving. Agitators, whose end objectives are getting good traction, arousing more activisim as the snouts rush to the trough. Key is a disgrace to the oath he took & the country he pledged to serve, He must have been thinking of a wholely indigenous people which all NZers are not,It is ALL NZers who you serve John Key..not a select & greedy few.The lack of public consultation & pre-emptive planning demonstrates deliberate deception, No-one in His position can allow himself naievity of this magnitude..less hes a decendant of pre WW2 British PM Neville Chamberlain. Wayne
*Absolutely yes. I have had enough. I am 64 years old and off to Aussie. Let them have it, stuff it up and the next generation can come back and take over again. I've had a guts full. Graeme
*Another massive error by the current Government. The decline started by Doug Grham in getting the Gravy Train under way, sorry, Treaty Claim. /Just keeps getting worse and worse. Alll other Races who live in NZ are becoming the under priviledged, disavantaged, discriminated against. Appalling to see a once proud country with true racial harmony, descending deeper and deeper into apartheid. Self determination you want? Take a look at Zimbabwe first, stupid idiots! Hugh
*What is 'indigenous'? Certainly not Maori. The signing of the Declaration is, in my mind, sowing the seeds of Civil War in New Zealand. Warren
*Like many NZ'ers I am very uneasy about the increasing racial division seen here. Can we not learn from history, that creating a superclass based on race or religion only leads to atrocities, justified by the radical minority as just compensation for past injustice. Janine
*John Key has got his "do a deal business blinkers" so firmly in place he has lost the ability to view what is happening from a holistic perspective, that is if he had it to start with? The thrill of the deal seems to be firmly entrenched in him and his team. Sandra
*This is an example of another rediculous decision by our government. Remember lowering of the drinking age, anti-smacking, the right-hand road rule fiasco etc. Governments seem unable to make common-sense decisions. Bernie
*The opposite. By suppressing the rights of Maori in NZ we actually create more ethnic tension. This is a step forward in relations between Pakeha and Maori. Amy
*Definitely, because the expectations of those seeking the recognition will be far greater than can ever be accomplished..its natural behaviour to always want more..than would be acceptable if those wishing for more worked harder to get it..not just expect it as of right. Audrey
*I get a little frustrated by the the term Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Every dictionary I have, has quite a few meanings of the word Indigenous, ie, Born of the land, Native of the land, Belonging naturally to a place, A native, Native born, Originating or produced naturally in a country. All of which I believe apply to me and everyone else born in New Zealand. Also what about my wife who is a third generation Moriori, it is all about Maori and not one full blooded one left alive. Neville
*Race based parties will predictably result in race based policies. If John Key does not understand this then John Key should not be the Prime Minister. The naivity shown by this government over the ETS, maori issues, smacking issues etc is unacceptable... the political opportunity for mp's who "cross the floor" is going begging. Murray
*I just don't understand why people are so surprised at the National Party sell out. My surprise is that it is happening quicker than I thought and far, far more blatantly. Last time National were thrown out it was because of their arrogance (read dictatorship). Mike
*OMG! It's already waaaay past division now. I have personally seen the situation getting worse and worse for the last 30 years. It amuses me that every generation takes so long to wake up to it. The most defining political statement ever made was by Don Brash - and look what happened! It's because equality is what we all want and most of us are sick of maori whinging and self victimising behaviour. It's time they stopped being taught in the home that "the white man raped your land and people" and get on with it! We all have 2 arms, 2 legs etc - we all have the same opportunities to make the best of our lives. Peter
*Yes and John Key has walked over the tipping point line with the latest part-Maori appeasement in April. It will result in the refined resentment that M. Laws wrote about,however it would be better if we took our collective shock and anger to the streets and had the politicians abolish Maori seats, consign the Treaty of Waitangi to history and end this racial divide for ever. Monica
*To sneak off a party to the UN, obviously planned & organised well in advance, to sign the “indigenous pipple's rites” charter ( aka gravy train ) smacks of deceit – and a fear that public reaction would be strongly against. Coupled with the Seabed & Foreshore proposal, it smacks of collusion & conspiracy. Whilst one can understand that John Key is trying to ensure that right-of-centre gummints have a better chance of being elected in future by weaning Maori off Labour's teat, the risk of upsetting ( to put it mildly!) a large proportion of National's core support appears to be a high-risk strategy.
There also appears to be a whiff of one-worldism in the seemingly avid support for all things UN – both this and AGW, where we are most definitely “leading the world”. Dave