|
Skip to make comment
|
Send to a friend
NZCPR
Guest Forum
Truancy:
a costly societal illness
Michael
Irwin
19 July 2009
Truancy
is a societal disease; which left untreated spreads and
affects the social, physical, judicial and economic well being
within our communities. Every day over 25,000 children are
absent from our schools, which is approximately 4.1% of the
school population (AND this is increasing). A minority of
these young people are chronic truants who hang-out in small
groups causing havoc within their community. This group has
been linked to theft, burglary, property damage, graffiti, car
conversion and assault.
At
the same time these truants are causing harm to themselves
through not receiving an education and by often partaking of
drugs, alcohol aand sometimes harmful thrill seeking
behaviours. Longitudinal studies conducting in New Zealand
(and similar studies overseas) have established a clear
correlation between:
-
Truancy
and academic achievement
-
Truancy
and criminal behaviour
-
Truancy
and substance abuse
-
Truancy
and unemployment
-
Truancy
and early parenting
Truancy
is a costly educational and social behaviour which needs
immediate attention to eradicate.
TRUANCY
FACTS
- Truant
rates have increased each survey since 2000
- During
survey week in 2006 there were 136,098 truants and 77,235
unjustified intermittent absences (Absent for part of day
without justification).
- Lower
decile schools have higher truancy rates (6.3%) than
higher decile schools (1.8%)
- Truancy
rates increase rapidly during secondary years. (Primary
1.95%, intermediate 2.2% and secondary 8.3%)
- Absence
rates for males and females are similar across all year
levels until secondary school. Early secondary school
female truants are slightly higher than equivalent males
and reverses at Year 12 and 13.
- Maori
and Pasifika students are over represented. Truancy rates
among these two groups are 3-4 times higher than Asian and
NZ European students.
These
findings are from a 2006 survey of 2426 NZ schools, the latest
statistics available.
I
argue that if we reduce truancy we would reduce crime. Youth
offenders (under 17 years old) make up 22% of total crime;
most of this is property offences. 24% of all criminal
offences are committed between 9am and 3:30pm. A suggested
scenario: play truant…need some money, a bit of
excitement…break into a property…sell stolen
goods…receive money…use money to entertain self/peers.
There is very clear correlation between truancy and offending.
The
message to every school age student needs to be ‘Every Day Counts’. Research clearly shows that those students with
high attendance (90% +) achieve the best results in NCEA or
other external examinations. A UK Report noted that to
effectively reduce truancy required specific programmes aimed
at truancy and an emphasis within schools to raise academic
achievement and standards. I have researched boys’
perceptions of factors that hinder or enhance their schooling
and identified a number of factors that boys’ believe affect
their motivation and learning. (Why boys? Because 80% of all
youth offenders are male). Boys know how they learn best. They
want hands-on active learning; learning that is relevant and
with the opportunity for challenge and competition. Boys like
clear boundaries and expectations, fair justice and
opportunities to succeed. The key is quality teachers and
supportive schools. Outside of school there are social, family
and peer pressures that bring pressures on students to become
truants. Schools need resources to offer a pastoral care
network that counsel, support and offer alternatives. Truants
don’t happen over night, they are created over time. Early
intervention is required. The problem is early intervention
costs.
Catching
truants can sometimes be the easy part. It is what happens
next that is important. To just return a truant, especially a
chronic truant to school is not enough. The truant is
returning to the very environment in which he/she disengaged
from and found boring, irrelevant and too hard. Truants often
have within a ‘boiling cauldron of emotions’ towards
school such as anger, resentment, alienation and failure.
There needs to be a specific programme for truants that
reintroduce or orientate them to the school and re-engages
them with learning. A
truancy programme needs four stages for the truant to
transform into an engaged student.
1.
The truant back attending school on a daily basis. It is the roll of the
District Truancy Services to find and get the truant back to
school. All schools within the district should be actively
supporting the local District Truancy Services and the
implemented truancy programmes.
2.
Opportunity to
connect with the school and have successful
experiences. Students who feel they belong will stay longer at
school and experience greater academic success. There is a
huge difference from ‘being at school’ and feeling
connected with school. Connection is the goal, feeling you
belong and have a place in the school community. Schools
require funding to be offer to programmes to reconnect truants
to school.
3.
The key to educational
success are quality teachers who establish affirmative
student–teacher relationships. My research with boys identified pupil/teacher
relationship a key criteria for students to be engaged
learners.
4.
Opportunities for engaging in challenging, relevant, activity driven learning.
Research has shown that best learning is more likely to happen
when curriculum and teaching methods are relevant and engaging
and the learning environment is emotionally safe.
Schools
are the key to turning truants around. However, schools need
staff and
resources to offer the specific programmes and support to
reconnect truants to school. Chronic truants can also have
problems with alcohol and substance, anger management and
other health issues which need treatment. It is far more
effective and economic to help the youth reconnect than wait
until costly adult issues occur. E.g. jail, major drug
dependency.
Along
side these four stages must be communication with the family.
To just threaten prosecution of parents for not sending
children to school is not enough. Families must become engaged
in their child’s learning and school.
There
is an increase in justified absences, which should not be
ignored. A justified absence is one that has been
satisfactorily explained to the school but often ‘hides’ a
form of truancy. Parents taking their school age children
skiing for a month or to a Pacific Island resort for fortnight
on a yearly basis should be considered an unjustified truancy.
Such students in the course of their primary schooling loose
between ten to twenty weeks of schooling due to family
holidays or activities. This type of truancy happens
regularly, especially with students attending higher decile
schools.
Parents
and schools both have clear obligations to school age
children. The Education act (1989) requires that parents
enroll their children at school and ensure they attend. The
Act also states that every school’s Board of Trustees takes
all reasonable steps to ensure the attendance of students at
school. Some parents and schools are not ensuring this
happens. Societal attitudes to schooling need to change.
Schools need to be held in high esteem and valued by community
and family/whanau. Parents who deliberately keep children from
school to look after siblings, to work, to go on a holiday or
for companionship are devaluing their child’s education. The
message to the child is school is not as important as a family
holiday, or family work or family companionship. Schools also
need to examine their attitudes. All schools should be
actively involved in their District Truancy Services. Schools should have rapid
check and response systems in place to ensure attendance at
every class. A school has a responsibility to examine barriers
to learning that occur with their community, especially for
the pupils who are failing or often truant. Each school must
examine teaching strategies, alternative learning programmes
and extra curricula programmes to ensure maximum student
engagement.
Truancy
is a disease in our community which spreads its sickness
through many aspects of our society. Dealing with truancy will
have a positive affect on reducing youth offending, property
damage, and improving youth health and wellbeing. Truancy
touches everyone; it is a community problem and requires a
community approach. Economically it makes sense to invest in
reducing truancy; reconnecting the truant with school is a lot
cheaper than the other option of unemployment, poverty line
and jail.
Skip to top |
Skip to make comment |
Send to a friend
Your
Comments:
To comment go to
letters to editor
>>>
Skip to top |
Send to
a friend:
|