Parliament

                   

Dr Muriel Newman 

Contact Muriel:

Email: muriel@newman.co.nz

Phone 09 4343 836 
or 021 800 111.

PO Box 984, Whangarei

 

comment icon Skip to comments | comment icon Skip to comment form | comment icon Poll result

28 October 05
The fatherless generation

This week concerns over youth gangs and violence have hit the headlines. It is a problem that can be found to a greater or lesser degree in many towns and cities throughout the country.

The debate over what can be done has ranged widely from more council amenities for young people, making education more relevant and improving after-school activities, to more pro-active truancy monitoring, more effective parenting, greater coordination between social agencies, and better policing.

While suggestions on what should be done to improve the situation have been free flowing, little has been said about the underlying causes of the problem. The reason is that it is no longer considered to be politically correct to discuss issues relating to personal responsibility, the home and the family. Yet the reality is that these are at the heart of the problem: children raised in stable, loving families, are more likely to join sports teams, rather than gangs.

Any discussion with police or those who work with troubled youth will quickly identify that the largest proportion of them come from homes where their biological father is absent: children raised in families without a father, where there is inadequate supervision and a lack of socialisation, are far more likely to become involved in anti-social behaviour and crime, than those raised with a dad.

Chief Youth Court Judge, Andrew Beecroft, in a speech at Parliament a few years ago identified six characteristics of serious youth offenders: “85 percent are male, the majority have no contact with their father, 80 percent do not go to school and have chronic drug or alcohol addictions, most have psychological or psychiatric issues, and 50 percent – up to 90 percent in some courts – are Maori”.

He explained that many of these boys have no adult male role model: “14, 15, and 16 year-old boys seek out role models like ‘heat seeking missiles’.  It’s either the leader of the Mongrel Mob or it’s a sports coach or it’s Dad.  But an overwhelming majority of boys who I see in the Youth Court have lost contact with their father. …What I’m saying is that I’m dealing in the Youth Court with boys for whom their Dad is simply not there, never has been, gone, vanished and disappeared”.

Judge Beecroft went on to say: “…every single young boy that we have dealt with has been abused as a child”.

This is why I am so passionately opposed to public policy and practice that encourages family breakdown and excludes biological fathers. A biological father is a child’s traditional protector. Removing him from the lives of his children leaves them extremely vulnerable to abuse, neglect and failure.

That is not to say that every child being raised without a dad that ends up in trouble, or for that matter that every child raised in a loving two parent household by their biological parents, turn out to be little angels. But, on the balance of probability, children raised without their natural father, will face greater difficulties in life, than children brought up with their dad to love, guide and protect them.

In 1990, Dr Daniel Amneus, Professor of English at California State University, in his book The Garbage Generation put it this way:  “Most criminals come from female-headed families. Most gang members come from female-headed families. Most addicts come from female-headed families. Most rapists come from female-headed families. Most educational failures come from female-headed families. Most illegitimate births occur to females who themselves grew up in female-headed families”.

He then went on to say: “If we are to deal meaningfully with crime, what we must do is reduce the number of female-headed families; what we must do is prevent the divorce courts from expelling half of society's fathers from their homes; what we must do is terminate a welfare system which displaces millions of men from the principal male role, that of family-provider. What we must do is make the father the head of the family”.

Here in New Zealand over the years, our policy makers have steadfastly ignored that wisdom. Instead, driven by a feminist agenda, which seeks to create equality for women by undermining men, society has now reached a sorry state: taxpayers are funding a hundred thousand women and girls to struggle to raise their children on their own, there is an epidemic of tens of thousands of abused children, and there is now an escalation in youth gangs and violence.

Boys are falling further and further behind at school now that we have taken away an external examination system that encouraged them to strive and excel. Men are finding themselves excluded from more and more of the professions like teaching that used to largely be their domain. Increasing numbers of fathers are being alienated from their children by our female-biased family court. Dads and grandfathers up and down the country are now afraid to hug and kiss their children in public.

It has all gone too far, and the sooner we return to some balance and common sense, the better.

To turn the situation around, we need to realise that New Zealand society is stronger when men and women both play an equal role, and that it is not in anyone’s interest to marginalize either. Further, we should be encouraging and supporting strong and committed families by removing the incentives in the welfare system and in family law that have lead to the massive undermining of the family. 

Print friendly version (PDF) View >>>

This weeks poll. What do you consider to be the most significant causal factors of youth crime? To take part in our online poll >>> 

If you would like to comment on this issue please click


comment icon Skip to top | comment icon Skip to comment form | comment icon Poll result

Your Comments:

To make up for the lack of a husband/partner in a child’s life single, sole girls with their babies need to be in supported living. The girls need to learn to care for themselves as well as their children. They need to get educated. Look at childcare options, open adoptions. Have a strong positive male mirror to reflect male virtues and strength. Additional children to the girl, by different fathers, must present a red flag that the children are at risk. Forget the P.C. the children have the primal right to sound care. They are at risk to start with; things can only deteriorate with more siblings. It’s as newborns they need to be on watch. Plunket once was the filter, now its optional, and the really needy fall through the net.


TV is the worst offender. Too many programs of either violence or sex and which the most vulnerable believe are what is the norm. Partnerships are easy to break up & divorce is pretty simple. Couples have lost the ability to work together through problems. Discipline is also lacking in schools thanks to our PC system. Respect for the elderly has disappeared. Maybe this is the PC way.


Poor parents do not educate their children in a positive way. They provide no stimulus, take no interest. Children from such homes arrive at primary school well behind those who have reading writing language and numeracy skills already well developed. Some are not even toilet trained and communicate in grunts only  --that’s all they have ever experienced. Once behind, they stay behind, forever discouraged, and the cycle goes on. Parenting license should be required before they can keep their children. Parenting is the most responsible thing in the world, yet treated in the most irresponsible manner by some. [Retd High School Principal]


I see the imported hip-hop "culture", which includes anti-social behaviour, aggressive "music", graffiti, boy racers, noisy cars, youth crime etc. as all being linked. I view with dismay the increasing legitimising of this crass and appalling culture in the news media and on TV programmes.


I cannot understand all the talk about poverty.  Sure, there are people who need that "safety net" provided by Nanny State, but benefits should be sufficient to feed and clothe families (frugally -I admit) and able-bodied people should be able to work at least part time and be topped up with a handout.  The whole welfare system is a crock, and continues to be stuffed up by inept idiots like the present batch who we have had for the last 6 years and continue to have stuffing up what should be Godzone.  They have taken away incentive to be self-reliant - I have an example of this in my own family who say if both parents work they lose their working for families’ handout.  And these are self-reliant young parents... I despair…


Families brought up in homes dependent on welfare, where nobody, works or gets out of bed and where hopelessness and helplessness is the norm. Education is not valued and truancy is a normal way of life adding to despair, boredom and the tendency to gather with others of similar ilk. Successive governments subscribe to this malaise by continuing to fund it without demanding any return from the recipients.


This is a community responsibility.  When a family is not functioning healthily, the whole community needs to take a part in providing support and mentoring for that family.  We live too much in isolation of others (in terms of giving meaningful support) and men need to be esteemed and encouraged to take an active part in the community.  Seeing men involved with children at rugby, martial arts, and other activities is wonderful and needs to be recognised and valued.


I believe we need to teach kids what I was taught by my parents ... every action has a consequence. That consequence can either be negative or positive, but there WILL be a consequence. These days, PC behaviour means no discipline (apart from time out - whoopee!) in either the homes or schools and certainly not in our youth justice system. Gone are the days where kids, when threatened with the thought of having to front to police, trembled and made good on their behaviour. Today, kids laugh at the Law, they swear at teachers, they berate and abuse their parents ... all due to lack of discipline and respect. I honestly believe a return to corporal punishment, threat of being expelled from school and sent to a reform school, and proper youth criminal facilities will soon put a stop to it all. I further believe our government needs to stop pandering to the gangs (Mongrel, Black Power, whatever).


My responses are subjectively, but I agree with the proposal that family breakdown is the single most important causal influence. Ethnicity is also, I believe, an important factor: Maori tribal "culture" is not conducive to stability in modern society. Pre-literate Neolithic social structures are not a good model in the modern world.


Families must be responsible for their own children.  Schools should be able to punish children at the school.  People should not be encouraged to have children out of wedlock or a permanent relationship.  There shouldn't be policies, which favour women going back to work but don't give the same consideration (financial - subsidised day care) to women staying at home to look after their children.  We need to teach more life skills at school.


There are significant times in a child life when a father’s discipline is required. Fathers cannot provide this if they are absent from the home, in another relationship or in jail or away in the armed services. A mother’s nurture is required especially after school when children want to talk about their day. Some mothers have been unable to juggle their work and home lives over the past thirty years, we are now reaping the youth crime that comes from the breakdown of basic family life. The absence of knowledge of the Love of God in young peoples lives is also a factor in youth crime. How can they Love unless they know they are loved? It is the whole communities responsibility to raise a positive child.  Parents who have raised positive Kids must be mobilised to assist raise future generations of positive Kiwi kids.


I would like to promote 'Big Buddy', a Man Alive project. Men prepared to commit at least one hour a week, are closely vetted for suitability before being paired off with a young lad from a single parent female environment. This organisation is presently only available in Auckland, but is growing rapidly.  For more information, phone 09 835 0504, or go to www.bigbuddy.org.nz


Bring back a good strong masculine presence into our country and allow our men to be men!!!


comment icon Skip to top | comment icon Skip to your comments | comment icon Poll result

Poll result:

 

 

Home  |  Contact  |  About NZCPR  |  How to support NZCPR  |  Site Map

Your comments and contributions are welcome. Send your comments here >>>
Opinions expressed are those of the contributors, and do not necessarily reflect those of the editorial staff. 
The NZCPR does not receive any government funding or support from any political party and has no party affiliations.

Director: Muriel Newman
Web design by Blue Dingo Creative Copyright ©2005, 2006, 2007, 2008. All Rights Reserved.
To report problems with the site, please email: webmaster@nzcpr.com