|
Skip
to this weeks poll |
Send to friend
2
May 2011
The
new politicial landscape
|
Printer
friendly version (PDF)
View
>>>
|
Former
British Prime Minister Harold Wilson once quipped, “A week
is a long time in politics”. Last week was a long time in
politics! Within
one week new forces have emerged at both ends of New
Zealand’s political spectrum: on the left in the form of
MP Hone Harawira with his new Mana Party, and on the
right the former National Party leader and reformist Don Brash
with the takeover of ACT.
In
democratic politics, vacuums are always filled. It could be
said that both new leaders have responded to political voids
created by incumbent parliamentary parties. Hone Harawira
believes that the Maori Party has lost its way and that the
Labour Party has abandoned its social justice roots, leaving
room for a party advocating for stronger rights for the Maori
sovereignty movement and a stronger voice for the
disenfranchised.
Don Brash
has watched on as the National Party has not only refused to
constrain government spending – and increased government
borrowing to $300
million a week –
but has turned its back on mainstream New Zealand to become a
cheerleader for the powerful iwi leaders group and their
agenda of Maori self-rule.
Politics
is the battle of ideas. It is ideas that influence people, which is why Think Tanks like the New
Zealand Centre for Political Research play a pivotal role in
informing the public, challenging the administration, and
building a mandate for change. The
NZCPR depends totally on the generosity of our newsletter
readers - your support is vital for us to continue providing
the principled analysis you’ve come to expect. If you
believe our work has value during this crucial election year,
then please support us here>>>.
Unfortunately
the new ideas that John Key promised and the new hope that he
represented when becoming Prime Minister in 2008 have come to
little. In that respect this National government is a bitter
disappointment and will now pay the price.
Helen
Clark was responsible for the largest expansion in the size of
government in modern times. Over the final three years of her
term in office, state spending grew from 29 percent of GDP in
2005 to 35 percent in 2008. It was economic mismanagement on a
grand scale. Not only did the country fall into a recession
months ahead of the global economic crisis, but the incoming
government was handed a raft of increasingly unaffordable
policies including interest-free student loans, massive
increases in Working for Families, and overly-generous
KiwiSaver subsidies. But rather than seizing the mandate for
reform given by electors, by cutting government spending back
to affordable levels, the National Party took the easy road,
positioning itself in the middle ground to essentially
continue Clark’s agenda.
To make
matters worse, and against all logical advice, National
implemented Labour’s wealth destroying emissions trading
scheme. More radical than any other in the world, this scheme
is burdening the economy with enormous costs, not only in
terms of rising prices of power and fuel - and all other goods
and services as well - but also in the country’s loss of
jobs as businesses relocate to friendlier shores.
The end
result is a tanking economy and families that are struggling
under falling living standards and increasing financial
pressure. But by failing to constrain government spending in a
prudent manner, the National Party has exposed themselves to
claims that their obsession with high poll ratings has come at
a huge cost to the economy - leaving the door wide open for
the return of Don Brash.
While
National has done too little to sort out the country’s
economic woes, they have done too much to appease the Maori
Party and the Maori sovereignty movement. In secret, National
signed up to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of
Indigenous Peoples, a treaty so radical that even the Labour
Government refused to sign. They authorised the flying of the
Maori sovereignty flag on public buildings on Waitangi Day.
They are pushing through increasingly generous Treaty
settlements, privatising schools, Police Stations, and other
iconic buildings, as well as engineering co-management deals
for National Parks and other public lands. They continue to
insert into legislation Treaty clauses and other raced-based
rights, such as special statutory Maori Advisory Boards.
They no longer talk about abolishing the racially based
Maori electorates even though they are an anachronism that
should have been abolished on the introduction of universal
suffrage in 1893. And now they have agreed to a Constitutional
Review jointly led by the Maori Party that has a clear goal of
entrenching the Maori seats and the Treaty of Waitangi into a
new race-based constitution.
But the
flash point came when National repealed Crown ownership of the
foreshore and seabed against the wishes of the public and in
spite of the promise by the Prime Minister that it wouldn’t
go ahead unless there was wide public support. By allowing the
Attorney General (who has clearly embraced the Maori
sovereignty movement’s goal of privatising public assets),
to push the bill through, John Key and all National MPs have
not only sold out their responsibilities to the wider public,
but they have taken the country down the dangerous path
towards racial division by elevating racial privilege for
Maori.
It is
these actions that presented Don Brash with a Grand Canyon
sized vacuum to fill. What is particularly astounding is that
many former National supporters warned the party that they
would lose their loyalty if they went ahead and passed the
disastrous Marine and Coastal Area Bill. But their appeals
were arrogantly dismissed by a party that assumed they had
nowhere else to go. The entry of Don Brash into the political
arena has given former National party voters a credible
alternative. National
could be in for a rude awakening when the next opinion poll is
released!
This
week’s NZCPR Guest Commentator is Professor Roger Bowden the
former head of Economics and Finance at the Victoria
University, with an economic perspective on the failure of
John Key’s government:
“Much
more insidious is the nation’s obsessive and continuing
preoccupation with economic rent seeking, which means dividing
up existing wealth by political or other means, at the expense
of creating new wealth. It’s an ancient preoccupation, but
in this day and age, rent seeking is built on the rights
movement and its accompanying mantras and mythologies.
“It’s
alive and well on several fronts in NZ, but iwi and their
activists have become grandmasters, extracting not only
immensely valuable real assets, but co-management deals for
natural resources that amount to an iwi tax. And just when we
thought the Waitangi gravy train was coming to an end, the
National led Coalition has started up an entirely new one. We
all knew where we stood with the Labour government’s
Foreshore and Seabed Act; and certainty itself has economic
value. I find it impossible to think of the National led
coalition’s 2011 Marine and Coastal (Takutai Moana) Act as
anything but tacky and dangerous in the way it was rushed
through; the
potential for use and misuse in its lack of criteria; and the
framework of reference and expectations it has set into train.
This is too much to pay for the baubles of political power or
legislative immortality, for it threatens our very
nationhood.” To read The
Economic Consequences of Mr Key, click
here >>>
All most
people want from a government is the power to create the
environment where they can improve their own lives and do what
is best for themselves and their family. In fact, most people
want governments to get out of the way and leave them in
peace. The problem is that it is not in the nature of big
governments to leave people alone. They need to intrude to
justify their existence. As President Ronald Reagan once said,
“A government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal
life we'll ever see on this earth!”
Since
becoming government, National has done little to turn New
Zealand into the opportunity society many wish for. Ask wealth
creators like small business operators and developers whether
compliance and red tape has reduced over the last two years.
The consensus will be that the situation has got worse.
All of
this has fuelled a growing despair that New Zealand has become
a Parliamentary dictatorship rather than an open democracy,
with traditional parties becoming disconnected from voters
between elections. Increasingly they are losing touch with the
public’s deep-seated concerns, such as a smacking law that
is doing nothing to stop child abuse but is seriously
undermining parental authority and respect.
Where is
the party that is promising to honour that 2009 Citizens
Initiated Referendum that overwhelmingly supported parents
having the right to discipline a child with a light smack?
Where is the party to honour the 1999 Referendum to reduce the
number of MPs to 99? In fact, where is the political party
prepared to push for Citizens Initiated Referenda to be made
binding, so the public have a mechanism to constrain a
government if it goes off the rails? After all, it’s not as
if Parliament would be overwhelmed by public lawmaking - only
four Citizens Initiated Referenda (CIR) have succeeded since
the CIR Act was introduced in 1993! The CIR to repeal the
Marine and Coastal Area Act will of course be the fifth!
With New Zealand being the only country in the world to have a
CIR process that is not binding on the government, surely in
the lead up to the 2011 election there is an opportunity for a
political party to announce that just as they trust the
opinion of the public enough to allow them to vote for their
government, then so too they trust the public enough to make
Citizens Initiated Referenda binding. The experience from
other countries shows that if referenda are binding, the need
for them reduces as governments become more attuned to public
concerns.
There are no signs yet that the reshaped political landscape that now
confronts Mr Key has any regard to restoring power to voters
through binding referenda. This is a vacuum yet to be filled!
This
week’s poll asks: Will
Don Brash’s return to parliament be good for the
country? Click here for poll >>>
Skip to top Skip
to this weeks poll
Send to friend
Your
Comments:
Reader's
comments will be posted on the NZCPR Forum page click
to view >>>
Skip to top Skip
to this weeks poll
Send
to a friend:
|