29 April 06 Treating
Men's Health Equally Printer
friendly version (PDF) View >>>
Last
year I presented a petition to Parliament calling for the
introduction of a national screening programme for prostate
cancer for men. As a result of that petition, I will be making
a submission to the Health Select Committee on Wednesday.
This
hearing comes amid revelations that almost 1500 men with
serious ailments - including suspected prostate cancer - are
having to wait longer than the Ministry of Health’s
prescribed maximum timeframe of six months to see a urologist
for the first time. It also follows the release of a damning
report by the Health and Disability Commissioner into the
complaints of a Southland man who had been forced to wait
almost two years for an “urgent” urological assessment,
despite test results indicating that he had a high chance of
having prostate cancer.
Prostate
cancer is the most common form of cancer in New Zealand. It is
a disease, usually occurring in men over the age of 40, in
which the cells of the prostate gland begin to grow
uncontrollably. There is a very strong genetic link with
prostate cancer – men who have a father or grandfather with
the disease are very likely to get it themselves.
Cancer
of the prostate is a ‘silent’ disease: men with early
prostate cancer are unlikely to have any symptoms at all, as
these only occur when the cancer is large enough to put
pressure on the urethra or disturb bladder function.
That
is a huge concern according to the President of the New
Zealand Prostate Cancer Foundation, Barry Young, who is this
week’s NZCPD guest commentator: “The insidious thing about
prostate cancer is that in it’s early stages it does not
generally exhibit symptoms, so a man may be walking around
with the disease and not know it. If he does begin to get
symptoms, and these turn out to be caused by prostate cancer,
then the cancer is much less amenable to treatment”.
Urologists
have advised the Foundation that some 300 lives a year could
be saved if prostate cancer is diagnosed early enough. When
caught and treated early, prostate cancer has a cure rate of
over 90 percent.
The
link between the early diagnosis of cancer and successful
treatment, underpins the effectiveness of national
cancer-screening programmes. New Zealand already has
programmes in place for the screening of breast cancer and
cervical cancer, and based on statistics, there is a strong
case for a national prostate-screening programme for men.
The
latest New Zealand Health Information Service data from 2001
shows that 17,913 people were diagnosed with cancer, and that
7,810 people died of cancer. Of those, 2,310 women were
diagnosed with breast cancer and 615 died of breast cancer,
and 189 women were diagnosed with cervical cancer and 63 died.
In comparison, 3,046 men were diagnosed with prostate cancer
and 592 men died of prostate cancer.
The
most common methods of detecting prostate cancer are through
the use of a blood test called the prostate specific antigen
(PSA) test, a digital rectal examination (DRE), and a biopsy.
A ‘two step’ screening process is the preferred
methodology with PSA and DRE tests being used in the first
instance to be followed by a biopsy where necessary. This is
similar to the practice used for breast cancer, whereby a
biopsy is undertaken only after a mammography and clinical
examination indicates the need for additional tests. Further,
the rate of “false positives” in PSA testing is similar to
the rate of false positives in breast cancer screening.
In
light of the importance of early detection of prostate cancer
and the fact that in those early stages there are no symptoms,
the American Cancer Society, along with the American
Urological Association, the American College of Surgeons, and
the American College of Radiology, recommends
that all men who have a life expectancy of at least 10 years
should be offered the PSA test and DRE annually beginning at
age 50. They also recommend screening earlier for at-risk
groups and stipulate that “discouraging”
testing and “not offering” testing are unacceptable
practices (click here
to view
>>>).
These
recommendations are completely at odds with those found on the
New Zealand Ministry of Health’s website: “The National
Health Committee do not recommend routine screening of men
without symptoms for prostate cancer in New Zealand” (click
here to view
>>>). In light of evidence that the early
detection of prostate cancer can save lives, this advice for
doctors and patients (formulated as a result of a
‘questionable’ report by the National Health Committee
which failed to follow standard peer review protocols), which
discourages any testing for prostate cancer until symptoms
appear, is in effect a death sentence to many men.
These
Ministry of Health recommendations are symptomatic of the deep
divide on the merits of prostate cancer screening that exists
within the medical profession, between those with a public
health perspective and concern for the most cost-effective
allocation of public health funding, and those with a focus on
individual patient health and wellbeing. However, I cannot
help but speculate that if prostate cancer were a disease
effecting women, a comprehensive screening programme would
have been introduced years ago!
Next
Wednesday I will be suggesting that as a first step, men in
the high prostate cancer risk group be given annual PSA and
DRE tests from age 40, and that other men have these as part
of a general ‘warrant of fitness’ check at age 50. This
will not only help to restore a better gender balance in our
health system, but it will also create a useful opportunity to
engage men more pro-actively in the health education process.
There
is a wealth of information on prostate cancer – the disease,
treatment, and prevention – which I will be posting on a
regular basis on the NZCPD website as part of a Prostate
Awareness Campaign. If you would like to join and support
this campaign please visit our prostate
support page and sign up.
Further
if you know of others who would be interested in joining a
Prostate Awareness Campaign, please pass this message on to
them, and if you know people who should be interested,
pass it on to them as well!
The
poll this week asks whether you believe a national
prostate cancer-screening programme should be introduced for
men?
To take part in our online poll
>>>
Your comments and contributions are welcome. Send your comments here
>>>.
Opinions expressed are those of the contributors, and do not
necessarily reflect those of the editorial staff.
The NZCPR does not receive
any government funding or support from any political party and has no
party affiliations.