The Clarkson Claim
The High Court claim in the name of Catherine Clarkson, on behalf of the Poronia Hineana Te Rangi Whanau, for the southern Hawke’s Bay coastline from Whangaehu to Poroporo including Cape Turnagain, is now underway.
To succeed, the claimants have to convince a High Court Judge that they have used and occupied the area exclusively and continuously from 1840 to the present day according to tikanga.
If you have information that shows that such a claim cannot be correct, we would like to hear from you. Please email email@example.com
In particular, we have provided a “My Evidence” template that you can use to set out your information. It is in Word format, so if you open/download the document you should be able to type it as normal. Otherwise, please print it and write in your information then scan it and email it or post it to NZCPR, PO Box 984, Whangarei.
A newspaper advertisement that has been published in the Hawke’s Bay Today newspaper, but could be used for more newspaper ads or as a household flier, can be accessed HERE.
The Clarkson claim is not the only claim lodged for the coast – there are six overlapping claims as well.
Following is some background explaining why the claims have been lodged, then we provide details on all of the overlapping claims, with maps and links to the claim applications lodged in the High Court.
If you have questions about any of this, please email us on firstname.lastname@example.org. Also please note that we provide regular updates on developments regarding the claims process through our free NZCPR Weekly newsletter – you can register for the mailing list HERE.
Under common law, New Zealand’s coastline and Territorial Sea were owned by the Crown on behalf of all New Zealanders.
However, following a controversial ruling in the Court of Appeal in 2003 that some customary title might exist in the foreshore and seabed area and that any such claim should be investigated by the Maori Land Court, Catherine Clarkson and hundreds of others lodged claims for the coastline up and down the country.
Since the Maori Land Court has the power to convert customary title to private title that can be sold, the Government of the day feared that the whole coast could end up being privatised. As a result, they passed the 2004 Foreshore and Seabed Act to restore Crown ownership of the coast but allow tribal management of claimed areas.
However, the National Government, at the behest of their Maori Party coalition partner, changed the law in 2011 to repeal Crown ownership and introduce the Marine and Coastal Area Act – see HERE – to allow tribal groups to again claim the coast.
National said that under the new law, which required claimants to have used and occupied the area exclusively and continuously from 1840 to the present day according to tikanga, there would only be a few claims for remote parts of the coastline. But instead over 600 claims were lodged covering every single beach many times over – and stretching out 22km to the edge of the Territorial Sea.
Some of the claims that were originally lodged in the Maori Land Court and transferred to the Foreshore and Seabed Act, were then transferred to the Marine and Coastal Area Act. The Clarkson claim was amongst them. These claims have now been given priority status in the High Court under section 125 of the new Act .
The first of these priority claims to be progressed to a hearing is the Clarkson application – see details below.
If you believe that the claimants have NOT used and occupied the Hawke’s Bay coastal area exclusively and continuously since 1840, then we need your help. Please complete the “My Evidence” template HERE and send it to email@example.com.
The New Zealand Centre for Political Research is a public policy think tank that opposed the repeal of Crown ownership of the coast. We have been working with groups who are opposing the claims in the public interest, but we need more detailed information that shows the claimed areas of the coast have been used by generations of New Zealand families not ‘exclusively’ by tribal groups.
We are very grateful for your help. And if you would like more background reading on this whole sorry saga, please go to our homepage HERE and enter the word coastal or foreshore into the website search function and you will be able to see dozens of articles that were have written about this over the years.
HIGH COURT APPLICATIONS:
The Clarkson application CIV-2011-485-789 that was lodged in the High Court can be seen HERE. The customary marine title area specified is described as Whangaehu to Poroporo including Cape Turnagain. It can be seen below – but, if you scroll down to the multi-coloured High Court map, you can see it as the red 122. (If the map doesn’t load, please refresh the page)
The application specifies:
If you do not agree that the Clarksons have exclusively and continuously used and occupied the claimed area from 1840 to the present day, then please let us know by emailing your “My Evidence” document to us.
There are six claims that overlap with this application. They are:
(1) CIV-2017-404-538 – Rihari Dargaville for New Zealand Māori
(2) CIV-2017-485-512 – Cletus Maanu Paul;
(3) CIV-2017-485-193 – Ngāti Kere Hapū (yellow 121 on the map);
(4) CIV-2017-485-224 – Rangitāne Tū Mai Rā Trust Group (blue 123 on the map);
(5) CIV-2017-404-481 – G Matthews for Te Hika o Papaūma Mandated
Iwi Authority (black 124 on the map); and
(6) CIV-2017-485-221 – Ngāti Kahungunu ki Wairarapa Tāmaki Nui-aRua Settlement Trust Group (green 127 on the map).
Two of the overlapping applications, CIV-2017-404-538 by Rihari Dargaville and CIV-2017-485-512 by Cletus Maanu Paul, are known as “National applications” since they are claiming the entire coastline of New Zealand therefore they overlap with all applications.
The applications are shown on the High Court map below (the coloured reference number has been listed for each claim to make it easier to see – 121, 123, 124, 127).
Details about each overlapping claim are as follows:
- CIV-2017-404-000538 – Rihari Dargaville for New Zealand Māori Council (Entire coastline)
Claiming all of the coastline of New Zealand including offshore islands.
- CIV-2017-485-000512 – Cletus Maanu Paul (Entire coastline)
Claiming all of the coastline of New Zealand…
- CIV-2017-485-000193 – Ngāti Kere Hapū (yellow 121)
This group are claiming customary marine title for Ouepoto Stream mouth down to Herbertville, and protected customary rights for Ouepoto Stream mouth extending further down past Herbertville to the Akitio River mouth.
It was stated in the application, that having a reduced title area was to avoid lodging a claim that overlaps with their Southern neighbours (Te Hika o Papauma and Rangitane), however they would consider amending their customary marine title application if no other applications overlapped (as it turns out there are a number of overlapping applications anyway).
The customary activities that would be undertaken include (but not limited to):
- Fishing and food gathering of many species of fish (flunder, turbot, mullet, kahawai, butterfish, snapper, gurnard, trevally, hapuku, moki, terakihi and more) and shellfish (pipi, cockles, paua, mussels, clams and more), eels, sea vegetables and many more.
- Collection of whitebait, pingoa, harakeke, eggs
- Bird snaring
- Transport, waka
- Planting and cultivating plant species
- Aquaculture activities
- Gathering other natural resources; and many more.
This group is currently pursuing a Crown engagement.
- CIV-2017-485-000224 – Rangitāne Tū Mai Rā Trust Group (blue 123)
The application area is defined as extending from the coast abutting Arataura (Poroporo) to the outer limits of the territorial sea; and extending from the coast abutting Turakirae Point to the outer limits of the territorial sea. They have also detailed at least 10 specific places within this area that they are applying for customary marine title of.
They are also applying for protected customary tights for rights including:
- Gathering many species of kaimoana such as mussels, pipi, paua, kina, rock lobster and edible seaweeds.
- Customary fishing for snapper, kahawai, baby sharks etc.
- Collection of water and plants
- There are also a number of other additional sites of significance that they are applying to practice customary rights in including Cape Turnagain.
- CIV-2017-404-000481 – G Matthews for Te Hika o Papaūma Mandated Iwi Authority (black 124)
This area that this application relates to is from the Whareama river mouth up to Poroporo to the outer limits of the territorial sea. This includes the common marine and coastal area of reefs, tidal rivers, streams and estuaries.
The activities that the Protected Customary Rights are based on include:
- Gathering kaimoana & other resources such as shells, seaweed, bones, stones etc
- Fishing including deep water fish
- Exercising kaitiakitanga, necessary for travel, trade, bird catching – snaring, harvesting plants, shrub & tree material
- Gathering resources for rongoa purposes
- Ceremonial practices such as hui & tangi
- CIV-2017-485-000221 – Ngāti Kahungunu ki Wairarapa Tāmaki Nui-aRua Settlement Trust Group (green 127)
This application area starts at a point just north of Poroporo down to Turakirae Head.
The customary marine title order for this application includes the following wahi tapu conditions:
- Access is restricted to only those parts of the application area where there has not been a drowning, death or a body or human remains found. The tribal group may perform a karakia or complete a period of rahui to deal with this event.
- Pollution, littering, gutting fish onto the beach or into the water, over-exploitation or wasting resources is prohibited in the application area.
The Protected Customary Rights orders they are seeking would give them the right to:
- Take, utilise, gather, manage and/or preserve most (some exceptions in the Act) natural and physical resources including sand, shells, gravel, pumice, driftwood and more.
- Tauranga waka and other traditional routes of travel
- Seed and harvest shellfish for non-commercial purposes
- Undertake and implement cultural practices such as rahui
Please don’t forget, if you believe that the claimants have NOT used and occupied the Hawke’s Bay coastal area exclusively and continuously since 1840, then please complete the “My Evidence” template HERE and send it to firstname.lastname@example.org.