Founder / Director

Dr Muriel Newman

Dr Muriel Newman

Newsletter

 

View our latest NZCPR Weekly Newsletter …               

Register newsletter– to receive this free newsletter each week by email click the button and register

 

Newsletter logo

 

Dear NZCPR Reader,

 

This week…

In this NZCPR newsletter we examine last week’s major announcements including the Government’s Emissions Reduction Plan and Budget 2022, our NZCPR Guest Commentator Richard Harman shares his analysis of the Budget, and our poll asks whether you believe the Budget is taking the country in the right or wrong direction.

Last week…

In case you missed it, in our last newsletter we discussed a Labour Party leadership change and looked into ACT’s call for the closure of Demographic Ministries – the Ministry for Maori Development, the Office for Maori-Crown Relations, the Ministry for Pacific Peoples, the Ministry for Ethnic Communities, the Ministry of Women’s Affairs, and the Human Rights Commission HERE, and our NZCPR Guest Commentator Dr Greg Clydesdale explains why the Ministry for Women should be disbanded HERE.

Plain English Petition…

If you were looking to sign our “Plain English Petition” – to prevent Maori language words being used in official English communications without the courtesy of a translation – it can be found HERE.

Will you support the NZCPR?

The New Zealand Centre for Political Research is a public policy think tank that provides research and commentary on matters of national interest. To protect our independence, we reject all forms of State assistance. Since we don’t run ads, have a paywall or offer subscriptions, it is only through the wonderful generosity of our readers that we can produce these newsletters and run our important campaigns. Your support is crucial – please click HERE to help us keep the flame of freedom and liberty alive, as we battle against socialism, the undermining of democracy, and the on-going attempts to divide us by race.  
[If you don’t like website forms, direct donation details are NZCPR ASB Bank account 12-3099-0833814-00 (please include your first name and email if possible).]

Thank you for your on-going interest and for your wonderful support – and please help spread the message by sharing our newsletters as widely as you can.

Warmest regards,

Signature

 

 

 

Dr Muriel Newman
NZCPR Founding Director

 

NZCPR Weekly:

SPLASHING THE CASH 
By Dr Muriel Newman

On Saturday, Australians voted for change.

While some claim the electorate had become tired of a three-term government and others believe there was a pro-climate change aspect to the vote, what was evident was a growing disenchantment with ‘establishment’ parties and a shift towards alternatives.

The same patterns of disenchantment is evident here. There is no doubt that an “anyone but Jacinda” groundswell has emerged and is gaining momentum. The question is can the Ardern Labour Government reverse the sentiment for change before the next election? With eighteen months to go, they have time on their side, but the two major announcements they made last week reinforce doubts about their competence to rescue their sinking ship.

Inflation reached a thirty-year high of 6.9 percent in March. That was due in a large part to two years of unprecedented borrowing and spending by Labour. Nevertheless, they have decided to fuel the fire with a record $10 billion of new spending announced in Budget 2022.

Of that, some $3 billion was earmarked for their climate change Emissions Reduction Plan, around $6 billion was new spending allocations built into Budget 2022, and an additional $1 billion cost-of-living crisis package was tacked on at the last minute to counter the traction being gained by opposition parties.

Furthermore, in response to claims by the opposition that he has “an addiction to spending”, the Finance Minister Grant Robertson has changed the way debt is reported by the Government – so it doesn’t look so bad!

Let’s examine some of the detail, starting with Labour’s whitewashing of debt.

The traditional measure of debt used by successive governments is “Net Core Crown Debt”. This is the sum of the debt owed by Government Ministries and Departments, and the Reserve Bank, minus their financial assets. It does not include the assets or liabilities of Crown Entities, any ‘advances’ made by the Government, nor the significant assets of the Super Fund.

Budget forecasts show Net Core Crown Debt in 2022 stands at $133.6 billion – the highest it has ever been – peaking at $173.3 billion in 2024. As a percentage of all economic activity, the 2022 debt is 36.9 percent of GDP – rising to 41.2 percent of GDP in 2024.

The new debt measure Minister Robertson has introduced, essentially halves the old debt measure. Called “Net Debt”, this new measure takes the old measure of Net Core Crown Debt of $133.6 billion, adds in the $14 billion of Crown Entity debt (including Housing NZ’s $7b in loans and the NZ Transport Agency’s $4b) then subtracts assets including the Super Fund’s $60 billion and $26 billion in government advances (including the $10b owed in student loans and the Reserve Bank’s $10b lending programme).

As a result of these changes, the debt balloon is ’magically’ reduced from $133.6 billion (36.9 percent of GDP) to a far more ‘respectable’ $61.2 billion (16.9 percent of GDP)” – $72.4 billion in debt erased in an instant!

Magically, Labour can now have us believe they haven’t created a massive debt burden for the country – as the Prime Minister was quick to demonstrate in her Budget speech, when she said, “Debt sits at 16.9 percent and is forecast to reach 15 percent in 2026. We’ve had a bigger economic knock from the pandemic but managed with a similar debt impact to the GFC.”

To understand her reference to the Global Financial Crisis, we looked back and found that in 2011 during the GFC, Net Core Crown Debt rose to 19.5 percent of GDP. In comparison, this year’s Net Core Crown Debt of 36.9 percent is almost double the debt impact of the GFC.  

It seems that comparing the new Net Debt measure for Budget 2022 of 16.9 percent with the old Net Core Crown Debt measure of 19.5 percent in 2011, has enabled the PM to magically claim her Government has generated “a similar debt impact to the GFC”.

It will be interesting to see whether the media fact-check the PM as readily as they do others – or whether they will turn a blind eye to her claim that Labour’s financial management is better than National’s during the GFC.  

The first of last week’s major announcements was the Emissions Reduction Plan – a $2.9 billion grab-bag of initiatives that will have no effect on the global temperature, but will fuel inflation, undermine our economic resilience, and lead to a reduction in living standards.

The plan included a ‘cash for clunkers’ deal to subsidise low-income families into eco-friendly cars, the construction of 100 kilometres of new cycleways, and a commitment to embed the Treaty partnership and matauranga Maori into the climate response – although quite how embedding the Treaty partnership is going to save the planet from climate Armageddon is not clear.

The Prime Minister explained, “no challenge is more present today and in the future than that of climate change… This $2.9 billion investment is the most comprehensive plan New Zealand has ever had on the issue of climate change. And it’s because we cannot responsibly postpone a transition we need to start making today.”

But here’s the reality, that Labour and the Greens – and the media – do not talk about. The world’s three major emitters – China, India, and Russia – have stated they intend to continue building coal-fired power stations and increasing emissions until 2060 and 2070.

Since New Zealand’s contribution to greenhouse gas emissions is infinitesimal on a global scale, our sacrifice, forty years ahead of any action from them, makes no rational sense at all – if reducing global emissions is, in fact, the objective.

If that’s not the objective, and climate change is being used by Labour and the Greens as a front to advance their socialist agenda, then, with almost no opposition pointing out that it’s impossible to maintain prosperity, when climate alarmism is penalising wealth creators and undermining economic growth, they are getting a free ride.  

Furthermore, our Prime Minister’s obsession with being seen to be leading the world in climate action, means we are suffering far harsher restrictions than our trading partners.

What makes all of this so much worse, is that the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – the body the Government relies on for advice – has already explained that if a country has an Emissions Trading Scheme in place, no other policy interventions are necessary to meet emissions targets: “If a cap and trade system has a sufficiently stringent cap to affect emission‐related decisions, then other policies have no further impact on reducing emissions”.

New Zealand does have a fully functioning ETS in place, which means Jacinda Ardern’s $2.9 billion policy package, that’s equivalent to $1,500 of spending for each Kiwi household, is needless – yet more wasteful ‘look-good’ spending that has become the hallmark of the Ardern administration.

When it comes to the Budget, this week’s NZCPR Guest Commentator, journalist Richard Harman – the founder of the political news website Politik – described it as ‘defensive’ and designed ‘to cut off National’s initiatives before they got any real political oxygen’:

“In his speech in the Budget debate, National Leader Christopher Luxon repeatedly talked about a ‘cost of living crisis’ induced by the current inflationary forces. Their answer is to raise the tax thresholds, which would see someone on the median wage ($56,160 a year) get an extra $800 in the hand.

“Finance Minister Grant Robertson, instead, is proposing a ‘temporary’ rebate of $27 a week for those earning less than $70,000. It will apply for only three months which Robertson says will means each payout will be $350. It is estimated to cost $814 million, and the Government is paying for it out of $3.2 billion of leftover funds in the Covid Response and Recovery Fund.

“The current excise duty and road user charges cuts are to be extended for two months, and half-price public transport extended for another two months and made permanent for Community Services Card holders from September.

“In essence, all this was Robertson’s response to Luxon’s ‘cost of living crisis’.”

If Labour’s $1 billion cost-of-living package felt like a last-minute add-on, that’s because it was.

Official advice warning against the scheme, was given to the Government on May 4 – just two weeks before the Budget: “The Treasury has advised that strong aggregate demand, combined with constrained supply and a tight labour market, will result in inflation staying above target in the near term. In this context, an increase in the level of fiscal support would further exacerbate inflation.”

There were also grave concerns over the rushed timeframe: “Given the narrow scope of the commissioning and the speed at which advice was produced, the advice does not include consideration of the full range of options for addressing the issue of increased costs of living for many New Zealanders. Owing to the very compressed timeframes… there is a risk that significant issues with the resulting proposal have not been identified.”

In response to the package, the Reserve Bank has signalled its intention to tighten monetary policy, which will impact on interest rates and affect economic activity and house prices – which are forecast to fall throughout 2022 and 2023. 

Another Budget initiative was Labour’s new law to prevent supermarkets from blocking competitors accessing land for new stores – a cynical move designed to ensure concerns over rising food prices are directed at supermarkets. However, it’s important to remember that a key driver of food price inflation is the Government’s zero-carbon policies – namely the almost 20-cents a litre carbon tax on petrol, which increases costs throughout the whole economy, especially on the production and supply of food.

A key feature of the Budget was $11 billion in health funding, which the Finance Minister proudly claimed was the largest ever increase in health spending – as if the spending itself was the triumph rather than the benefits it is meant to deliver.

This spending has become necessary because of Labour’s decision to restructure the health system to introduce Maori co-governance. Part of the funding will be used to clear the debts of the District Health Boards which are scheduled to be abolished on 1 July. The Government says this will give health a ‘fresh start’. But with the so-called ‘fresh start’ creating two classes of patient – Maori and everyone else – that too is fanciful spin.

With anecdotal evidence showing the health system is ill prepared for this radical change, the reality is that no responsible government would cause such disruption during a pandemic – only one driven by radicals. In this case, the fifteen MPs of Labour’s Maori Caucus are putting their desire for tribal control of health ahead of the needs of all other New Zealanders.

These MPs have also been successful in directing over $1 billion of the budget into race-based Maori initiatives. While Maori Development Minister Willie Jackson claims it was the highest Maori budget “in the history of Government”, the Maori Party predictably say it is not enough!

In the aftermath of the Budget, a consensus is emerging that Labour is devoid of ideas to address the problems facing New Zealand. Instead of dealing with the cost-of-living crisis by simply adjusting tax thresholds for inflation – to put more money into the pockets of Kiwis who earned it and prevent them being forced into higher tax brackets – Labour opted to turn us into a nation of beneficiaries.

Once their new scheme is underway, over 80 percent of New Zealanders will receive some form of support – either the Winter Energy Payment or the cost-of-living payment.

In the lead up to the Budget, it became clear that Labour needed a circuit breaker to arrest its decline in the polls and regain control of the political narrative. But if a $350 payment to turn the country into a nation of beneficiaries is the best they can come up with to deal with a cost-of-living crisis then one has to conclude that the Labour Government is the problem.

Please note: To register for our free weekly newsletter please click HERE.

THIS WEEK’S POLL ASKS:

*Does Budget 2022 take New Zealand in the right direction or the wrong direction?

*Poll comments are posted at the end of the main article.

 

*All NZCPR poll results can be seen in the Archive.

 

 

NZCPR Guest Commentary:

 
“PRUDENT” BUT WAS IT POLITICAL ENOUGH 
By Richard Harman

“There was some worrying data in the Budget documentation. Treasury is forecasting inflation to gradually begin falling this year until it gets below three per cent (the Reserve Bank’s upper inflation limit) in 2024-25.

“National Leader Christopher Luxon is focusing on inflation as the core of his attack on Robertson: ‘The Budget forecasts that inflation isn’t actually due to come down below 3 per cent until 2025,’ he said in the Budget debate. ‘And what that actually means is that this cost-of-living crisis is going to go on for longer and for some time, and Kiwis will keep going backwards.’

“The ANZ Bank’s senior economist, Miles Workman, described the inflation forecast as ‘frankly alarming’ because Treasury was saying most of the inflation would be non-tradable inflation generated domestically: ‘The concerning persistence in non-tradable inflation (bolstered by the tight labour market) means that an aggressive monetary policy response is needed, even if it will likely cause higher unemployment,’ he said.

“Kiwibank’s economists also see non-tradable inflation as a particular worry: ‘Blocked supply chains, rising energy prices and elevated shipping costs have pushed prices higher. But a lack of spare capacity, particularly in the construction sector, has driven non-tradable (domestic) inflation higher, reaching a 30-year high of 6.6% in March. What’s worrying is that domestically generated inflation is the stickier, more persistent kind. Indeed, the Treasury sees non-tradable inflation essentially flat and above 6% until the latter half of 2023’…”

*To read the full commentary please visit the NZCPR.com website.

Clicktoviewx150

What’s new on our Breaking Views blog…

Breaking Views is administered by the NZCPR – the views are those of the authors. Here is a selection of this week’s articles…     

  • Henry Armstrong: The UNDRIP Declaration Plan
    The Ardern government is currently working on a plan, in conjunction with The Ministry of Maori Development, the Iwi Chairs Forum, and the Human Rights Commission, to give effect to the UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in New Zealand… 
  • Graham Adams: Is the jig up for Three Waters?
    The rumour that a majority of Labour’s caucus is beginning to stand up to the powerful Maori faction over the co-governance of Three Waters was circulating before Seymour declared that Three Waters is “a Treaty settlement disguised as an infrastructure project”…
  • Derek Mackie: Prince Harry’s Woke Travel Tips
    You’ve got to hand it to Prince Harry. He could easily have settled for a cushy, but coma-inducing life as a major Royal, being paid an extortionate amount to smile, wave and open public events. But no! He’s decided to be his own man…
  • Helen Egmont: Everyone Knows
    Our governments have created many carefully built straw man beliefs around covid which they have inserted into our environment using acknowledged techniques of social manipulation -many of which have been lifted from marketing and advertising research…
  • Roger Partridge: Blowing the budget
    The Finance Minister’s error was failing to respond to changes in the country’s economic predicament. The Climate Minister’s error was failing to realise the Government has already implemented a policy to achieve the objectives in his Emissions Reduction Plan – the ETS…

Spreading the message:

**REGISTER FOR OUR NZCPR WEEKLY NEWSLETTERS**

Anyone who would like to receive our free NZCPR Weekly newsletter is more than welcome to register for the mailing list HERE.

Please help us spread the message by sharing our newsletters…

Please help us spread the message about our newsletters by sharing them as widely as possible. This can be done by forwarding the newsletter itself, or, if there are problems with spam filters, by sharing the newsletter link: www.nzcpr.com/newsletter. Content from the newsletter can also be copied into your own email. To share individual articles on social media, please visit the website and click on the article in question – the Facebook and Twitter “share” buttons can be found on the top right, along with buttons to “share by email”, and “Print”.    

Have Your Say…

Speaking out in a democracy is crucial – please find all MP email addresses, local authority councillor email addresses, contact details for newspaper letters to the editor, social media links, and other useful contacts on our “Have Your Say” page HERE.

Ensuring you receive our newsletter…

To ensure you receive our newsletters, please whitelist our newsletter mailing address – or add it to your ‘safe senders’ list. The address to whitelist is: newsletter-bounces@nzcpr.com … If your newsletter fails to arrive, it can be viewed at the ‘Newsletter’ link on our NZCPR.com website.

facebookrsstwitteryoutube

___________________________________________________
New Zealand Centre for Political Research
PO Box 984 WHANGAREI
Ph: 09-434-3836, Fax: 09 434-4224, Mob: 021-800-111
muriel@nzcpr.com
www.nzcpr.com

To unsubscribe from the newsletter, send this email – but don’t forget to reply to the confirmation message.
If you need help unsubscribing, please email admin@nzcpr.com with “REMOVE” in the subject line.
Please note it’s important that you contact us over unsubscribing problems because
it’s often caused by the fact that it was an older address that was registered,
not your current one, and we will need to search for that. 

To change your address please email admin@nzcpr.com with “ADDRESS CHANGE” in the
subject line, advising the new address to be added and the old one to be removed.